Ontology Of The Sun

Ontology of the Sun could be pondered by checking where its physical size stands, on the cosmic scale.

Question: 

What would be the size of the Sun, if the Milky Way was the size of a basketball?

Answer: 

We can do this by scaling the Milky Way's diameter down to the size of a basketball and then finding the corresponding scaled down size of the Sun.

The diameter of the Milky Way is approximately 100,000 light-years. A basketball has a diameter of roughly 0.24 meters.

Now, let's find the scaling factor:

Scaling factor
= (Diameter of basketball) / (Diameter of Milky Way)
≈ (0.24 m) / (100,000 light-years)

1 light-year = 9.461 × 10¹⁵ meters
100,000 light-years = 9.461 × 10²⁰ meters

So the scaling factor is approximately 2.535 × 10⁻²².

Scaled diameter of Sun = Actual diameter of Sun * Scaling factor ≈ 3.527 × 10⁻¹³ meters

So, if the Milky Way was the size of a basketball (0.24 meter in diameter), the Sun would be approximately 3.527 × 10⁻¹³ meters in diameter. This is smaller than the smallest atom, the Hydrogen atom (Diameter is 10-10 meter) and that's a pointer to the ontology of the Sun...

And that brings me to a poem I wrote many years back, pondering human ontology.

"DARK MAYA"
At night you cannot tell objects from shadowsreality from reflections..  & when the Cosmos sleeps there are only dreams, only reflections
 Mystical darkness ocean of illusions sea of shadows seat of wonder 
 In the depths of darkness you cannot tellobjects from shadowsreality from reflections.. 
& when the Cosmos sleeps there are only dreams,only reflections 
 Out there in deep space  On a canvas broad enough  where even our blazing Sun is lesser than an atom
Dark Maya dances  on the dead body of time.
It's always good to dream.. 
With the flowing body of Dark Maya.. sparkling with suns, galaxies and stellar clustersWrapped around your soul

The Shadow Self

Tantric truths are seldom easy to handle. The tantric path is not a comfortable, easy path. It entails a total disintegration of what you THINK. Your perspectives, beliefs, conclusions, self image. Et al.

Progress happens through DESTRUCTION or the illusion of it.
_________________________________

Passage from Kundalini-Teacher.Com

PART 1

Carl Jung defined the Shadow Self as "that which we think we are not."

...You may believe that you are not like your neighbor who does this or that bad thing, but if those negative qualities you judge, were not also a part of you, then they would not trigger your emotions...

You may believe that you are a person who is not cruel or unjust, but that belief is a blockage that casts a shadow that can blind you to the cruelty within your ego that is hidden. The shadow shows the "Ugly Mirror of All that Is": you are what you judge yourself not to be. You are what you judge others to be....

PART 2
Passage from: SHADOW DANCE

The Shadow

The Shadow, is a psychological term introduced by the late Swiss psychiatrist, Dr. Carl G. Jung. It is everything in us that is unconscious, repressed, undeveloped and denied. These are dark rejected aspects of our being as well as light, so there is positive undeveloped potential in the Shadow that we don’t know about because anything that is unconscious, we don’t know about.

The Shadow is an archetype. And what an archetype simply means is that it is typical in consciousness for everyone. Everyone has a Shadow. This is not something that one or two people have. We all have a Shadow and a confrontation with the Shadow is essential for self awareness. We cannot learn about ourselves if we do not learn about our Shadow so therefore we are going to attract it through the mirrors of other people.

Projection and Denial

Projection is an unconscious psychological mechanism. We all project onto other people parts of ourselves that we disown, that we deny. We will usually not identify with the projected quality or characteristic at all. It’s them. It’s not us.

We will feel highly uncomfortable when we are around someone that is carrying a part of our Shadow. As I said before, and it bears repeating, there will often be a repulsive element to it. We will be repulsed by that person and whatever they stand for. It will feel like whoever they are is totally against our principles, moral values and ideals and we will be highly critical of their actions or way of being in the world.

_____________
PART 3

Here is an old photoshop of mine, in which a nice, pleasant looking Sharon Stone transforms...

"THE COMPLETE BEING"



________

Recommended Link for understanding the 'SHADOW' in more detail: Dakini Notes.